Scientists develop 'biological clock' that measures how fast your body is truly aging

Two people of the same age can look a decade apart — one youthful, the other visibly worn. The reason lies in the gap between the age on a birth certificate and the biological age that cells have actually accumulated.

A research team has developed a "body age clock" capable of measuring how quickly a person is aging and estimating their risk of death, according to a study published in the journal Nature.

Researchers at Harvard Medical School integrated more than 11,000 gene-activity datasets drawn from over 25 tissue types across mammals, successfully predicting aging rates and mortality risk. The study also found that the genetic changes associated with aging appear consistently across species.

Biological clocks are not new. The most widely used today read patterns of chemical markers that attach to DNA — a method that works by tracing how those markers accumulate over time.

While highly accurate at predicting age, such clocks have struggled to explain the specific biological causes and pathways that drive aging.

The Harvard team took a different approach. Instead of DNA markers, they measured gene activity directly — tracking which genes inside a cell are switched on, when, and to what degree. Because the functions of individual genes are relatively well understood, this method allows researchers to trace far more precisely which pathways are linked to aging. The drawback is that gene activity fluctuates with stress, infection, exercise, and even the time of day.

The team overcame that instability through sheer data volume. Their starting point was a cohort of mice enrolled in a U.S. program that tests compounds for their ability to extend lifespan.

Gene-activity data were extracted from the organs of mice treated with 20 drugs and interventions — including immunosuppressants and diabetes medications — that had shown measurable effects, positive or negative, on longevity. The team then added roughly 3,500 mouse samples, about 2,600 primate samples, and around 4,000 human samples, bringing the total to more than 11,000 datasets.

The resulting clock predicted the biological age of mice to within a margin of 2.1 months. When applied to mammalian species not used in training, it maintained high accuracy — suggesting that aging patterns are broadly conserved across mammals.

What drew particular attention was not the clock itself but how sensitively it responded to interventions that actually reverse aging. Earlier age-prediction clocks were good at detecting diseases that shorten life but tended to miss treatments that extend it.

The team surgically connected the circulatory systems of old and young mice, allowing them to share blood for three months. The old mice that received young blood showed a significant drop in their mortality clock scores, displaying signs of cellular rejuvenation. The effect persisted even two months after the connection was severed.

Young mice exposed to old blood, by contrast, saw their aging scores rise temporarily during the experiment before returning to baseline after separation. Caloric restriction — feeding the mice less — also lowered aging clock scores.

The team then validated their animal findings in humans.

Analyzing blood samples from more than 50,000 participants drawn from a UK medical database that has tracked over 500,000 people over time, the researchers found that the key proteins whose levels fell in mice given young blood or placed on caloric restriction behaved the same way in human blood.

Even after adjusting for age and sex, people with higher levels of those proteins had higher overall mortality rates.

The team also uncovered an intriguing finding: the clock that most accurately predicted a person's chronological age was not the same clock that best predicted the actual timing of death. The visible pace of aging and the pace at which the body approaches death follow different internal signals.

The team also pursued a more granular analysis, treating aging not as a single uniform process.

By grouping related genes together, they built 28 separate clocks covering distinct biological domains — among them chronic inflammation, mitochondrial energy function, and structural changes to DNA.

Running those domain-specific clocks revealed striking differences. Chronic conditions such as cancer and diabetes primarily accelerated the "inflammation clock," while caloric restriction rejuvenated the "energy metabolism clock" most intensively. What ages — or grows younger — depends on the treatment or dietary habit in question.

However, the team acknowledged limitations: because gene activity shifts easily with stress or day-to-day physical condition, the test's stability remains low at this stage. It is also still unclear whether the observed genetic changes are a cause of aging or a consequence of it.

DOI: 10.1038/s41586-026-10542-3

Does greater gender equality lower birth rates? The demographic secret behind falling populations in developed countries [Huam-dong Paper Lab] South Korea's total fertility rate stands at 0.72, among the lowest in the world. New research suggests that figure may not be solely the result of economic pressures or housing costs.

https://biz.heraldcorp.com/article/10759750

성평등 높아질수록 출산율 떨어진다?…선진국 인구 줄어든 ‘인구학적 비밀’[후암동 논문 연구소]

https://biz.heraldcorp.com/article/10759750