National Pension Research Institute report reviews adequacy of survivor pension benefits
Half of recipients are low-income; serious threat to livelihoods of elderly women
South Korea's national pension survivor benefits — designed to support families left behind after the death of a breadwinner — are failing to fulfill their purpose, according to a new report.
The amounts recipients receive fall short of even the minimum needed for basic subsistence, leaving more than half of recipient households exposed to the risk of poverty.
According to a report released Wednesday by researchers Kim Hye-jin, Jeong In-young, Son Hyeon-seop and Lee Ye-in of the National Pension Research Institute, the total number of survivor pension recipients stood at about 1.08 million as of 2024. Of those, 922,513 — or 85.4 percent — received survivor benefits exclusively, with no overlap from other pension types.
The average monthly survivor pension payment across all recipients in 2024 was just 354,044 won ($230). Even among those receiving survivor benefits alone, the monthly average came to only 363,133 won — well below the government-set minimum livelihood benefit of about 630,000 won for a single-person household.
In practice, 66.7 percent of all recipients received between 200,000 won and less than 400,000 won per month, while fewer than 1 percent received 1 million won or more.
The low benefit levels stem primarily from the short national pension contribution periods of the deceased subscribers.
Among sole survivor pension recipients in 2024, the average contribution period of the deceased was 154.7 months — roughly 13 years. Under the current system, subscribers with fewer than 20 years of contributions receive only 40 to 50 percent of the base pension amount, meaning a large share of recipients cannot qualify for the maximum payout rate of 60 percent.
An analysis of recipients' living circumstances using the Korean Retirement and Income Study panel data revealed pronounced economic vulnerability among this group.
Adjusted for household size, the relative poverty rate among survivor pension recipient households was 53.77 percent — meaning more than one in two recipients earns less than half the median income of the broader population.
Among recipients aged 65 and older, the relative poverty rate climbed to 60.34 percent, a more serious level of old-age poverty risk than that seen among recipients of old-age pensions or other public pensions. The absolute poverty rate — the share earning less than the minimum cost of living — stood at 15.26 percent among survivor pension recipients, more than double the rate of other pension groups.
Also notable is that 90.1 percent of survivor pension recipients are women.
Middle-aged and elderly women left alone after the death of a spouse who was the primary earner face structural income vulnerability. Recipients who participated in focus group interviews said the regular arrival of survivor benefits provides a minimal sense of financial security, but in practice nothing is left after paying maintenance fees and utility bills, forcing them to rely on unstable income sources such as private transfers or part-time work.
The researchers concluded that pension system reform alone has limits in raising monthly benefits to 1 million won or more in the short term, and proposed introducing a supplementary benefit program outside the existing system to provide meaningful support to vulnerable survivor households.
In particular, they put forward as a viable alternative a top-up benefit scheme — funded through government subsidies — that would temporarily fill the gap to a minimum living standard for survivors under 65 who face the greatest risk of financial hardship.
thlee@heraldcorp.com